Search for: "United States v. Chu" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2016, 1:50 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Following an eight-day benchtrial, the United States District Court for the SouthernDistrict of Texas denied both parties’ claims. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 9:48 am
As explained by the Appeals Court, the Coalition on West Valley Nuclear Wastes, et al contend that the United States Department of Energy (DOE, & Secy. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 11:15 am by Florian Mueller
Chu did his best to deliver a passionate, patriotic argument about the United States having been the leaders in technology for more than 200 years "in every facet of life. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 1:30 pm by WIMS
The Administration is committed to promoting nuclear power in the United States and developing a safe, long-term solution for the management of used nuclear fuel and nuclear waste. [read post]
14 May 2019, 12:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
” Solicitor Francisco suggested that Laura Peter be substituted as petitioner in her official capacity as the Deputy Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:23 pm by David Lat
President Barack Obama delivered his State of the Union address this evening, and it was even less exciting than last year (which was less exciting than the year before, when the famous Obama v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:06 am by Larry
 That brings us to the first of a pair of decisions: United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:32 am by Dennis Crouch
In fact, Chu states that "the invention as now claimed[ ] was not described in the [Doyle] patent. [read post]
The current version bars some or all people from seven, mostly Muslim-majority countries, from entering the United States. [read post]