Search for: "United States v. City and County of San Francisco"
Results 101 - 120
of 371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2014, 9:34 am
City and County of San Francisco (2014) 222 Cal.App.4th 209. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 1:04 pm
Glendening, 709 A.2d 1230 (Md. 1988) and City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 9:20 pm
Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, 387 US 523 (1967) which decided that: “‘Inspection programs aimed at securing city-wide compliance with minimum physical standards for private property’ are reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 9:20 pm
Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, 387 US 523 (1967) which decided that: “‘Inspection programs aimed at securing city-wide compliance with minimum physical standards for private property’ are reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 12:13 pm
City and County of San Francisco, 10-1034, which involves an Establishment Clause challenge to a resolution by the San Francisco Board of Supervisors urging Cardinal William Joseph Levada to withdraw his directive that Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of San Francisco stop placing children in need of adoption with same-sex couples. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Briefly: At his Understanding the Americans With Disabilities Act blog, William Goren discusses City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:33 am
Given that the California Supreme Court, in City of San Jose v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 8:11 am
(The bulk of the brief for the City and County of San Francisco is devoted to this argument.) [read post]
21 May 2014, 3:26 pm
City & County of San Francisco, a civil rights lawsuit that calls into question whether technology alone can provide the basis for reasonable suspicion under the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:50 pm
For fiscal year, 2018, the Justice Department nonetheless sought to impose slightly revised versions of the same three conditions, plus two new ones, summarized in today's ruling by Judge William Orrick of the US District Court for the Northern District of California, in a case brought against the administration by the City and County of San Francisco, and the state of California: The nondisclosure condition provides that: Consistent with the… [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:15 am
The stay means San Francisco companies with 50 or more employees must now spend a minimum amount on private or city-provided health care coverage for their workers. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
The Court found instructive San Francisco Tomorrow v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:38 am
Williamson County v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:38 am
Williamson County v. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 12:20 pm
Inc., et al., San Francisco County Superior Court (trial Sept. 2 through 10, with verdict returned Sept. 10, 2014) (Hon. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 6:47 am
City and County of San Francisco, et al. can be found here. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
” At Cities Speak, Lisa Soronen discusses last week’s cert. grant in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:00 am
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 11:44 am
City and County of San Francisco (2005) 125 S.Ct. 2491.) [read post]
