Search for: "United States v. City of Montgomery" Results 81 - 100 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2015, 5:41 pm by Steven Cohen
Facts: This case (Colbert County Northwest Alabama Health Care Authority d/b/a Helen Keller Hospital v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:14 am by Lyle Denniston
United States, the Court will spell out when a mandatory minimum prison sentence is required under a federal law against child pornography, based on a prior conviction under state law for sexual abuse. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-419. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
The Court has already granted cert. to answer the first question in Montgomery v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am by John Elwood
  The state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am by Maureen Johnston
Donald 14-618Issue: (1) Whether the Michigan courts' decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-6820, comes to us from the City of Brotherly Love. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
The Justices are considering Montgomery v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
The Court has relisted a bevy of potential replacements for this Friday’s conference, including Montgomery v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
United States, or (b) “preventing further [government] disclosure,” United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 14-456Issue: Whether, when a court of appeals issues a general remand for resentencing, the district court may conduct resentencing de novo. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:09 pm
Lawmakers’ content- or viewpoint-based intentions generally don’t invalidate facially content-neutral speech-restrictive laws, see United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:00 am by Emily Dorotheou, Olswang LLP
The House further considered the case of Bolitho v City and Hackney Health Authority [1998] AC 232 which found that the court has to be satisfied that the body of medical opinion relied upon has a logical basis. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The bill would have rolled back the state and city public accommodations laws that forbid discrimination by private business entities on the basis of race, gender, sexual orientation, alienage, and disability. [read post]