Search for: "United States v. Coffey" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am by Schachtman
Indeed, one expert in the employ of the United States government, who would go on to become a major testifying expert witness for plaintiffs in asbestos litigation, opined in a 1973 publication, that mesothelioma was a problem limited to exposure to South African crocidolite, which was not in every asbestos-containing insulation product.[9] In any event, Judge Wisdom never directly addressed Section 388, and the framing of the Borel case as a consumer case prevailed. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am by Colin Murray
It is wishful thinking, therefore, to argue, as  Stewart Jackson (Peterborough) (Con) does, that: Is not it true that the recent case of Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom specifically allows the Government to proceed with a range of policy options, which, like the consultation in 2009, could be put out for public discussion? [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:41 am by CMS
Throughout this assessment, it is important to remember that this hugely depends on the evolving social context, vulnerability of the victim and the role played by state responsibility, all of which will be discussed in this essay. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Many are reported to be seeking asylum.[1] They have active proceedings to determine their status and, pending such determination, are authorized to remain in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm by Dan Ernst
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 3:50 am by Kyle Hulehan
Key Findings A year since the global tax deal was agreed to by more than 130 countries, progress on implementing legislation has hit a lull. [read post]