Search for: "United States v. Colding"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,079
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2024, 3:16 pm
Maryland, as well as to United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
In 1962, in Robinson v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:21 am
” The United States has filed a brief in the case and asked to take part in arguments. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Young suggested that perhaps the SILS test was akin to cold fusion. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 8:12 am
If the plaintiffs in LePage go to trial against the clinic involved, we will learn how it came to be that someone was able to wander into the embryo nursery, remove embryos from the cold storage unit, and destroy them. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
I was also counsel—though not lead counsel—in United States v. [read post]
The Implications of An ICJ Finding that Israel is Committing the Crime Against Humanity of Apartheid
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
This is because the United Nations created special mechanisms to coordinate efforts to eradicate apartheid during the Cold War when the U.N. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
So every time a relative sues to try to get damages for the death of a relative in the United States, those are all statutory. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
Yet apart from a handful of exceptions in the aftermaths of WWII and the Cold War, this obligation has rarely been enforced against recalcitrant States. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:35 pm
Whether the prohibition on unfair and deceptive practices in WCPA protects against price gouging is a question of first impression that originally came before Judge Lasnik in the United States District Court in the Western District of Washington. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:05 am
Is the Court getting cold feet? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 4:36 pm
Beyond that, the man should be allowed to fade into history and the United States should move on. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
In Connick v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
The Office of Legal Counsel Discloses Classified List of Opinions in Important Step for Transparency
21 Dec 2023, 9:02 am
The case that led to the production of these documents, Francis v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 6:31 am
Voting is now open! [read post]
