Search for: "United States v. Commonwealth &c. Trust Co" Results 21 - 39 of 39
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2014, 1:58 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (Sandiford) v The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 4 June 2014. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 1:42 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The Court is in recess until Wednesday 4 June, when the appeal of R (Sandiford) v The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs will be heard. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am by Brian E. Barreira
In the case of Walker, the offending language was: “The Trustee is prohibited from spending sums of interest or principal to [Walker] for her benefit for services which are otherwise available under any public entitlement program of the United States of America, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any political subdivision thereof. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
A        Institutional, Doctrinal, and Judicial Vehicles of Legal Diffusion ·         The Society for Comparative Legislation - A Vehicle for Legal Diffusion, David Schorr, Tel Aviv University (Israel) ·         Anglo-American Law in 20th Century Italy: Mario Sarfatti’s Contribution to Comparative Law, Annamaria Monti, University of Bocconi (Italy), … [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 3:23 pm by Howard Knopf
In other words, legally made works can be bought and sold and resold on the “grey” (or “gray” for those not in the Commonwealth) market, according to common sense. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Taft, Anti-Semitism in the United States (1920) Benjamin N. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
Specifically, plaintiff asserted that the Village Zoning law, Chapter IX, Section E was void for vagueness and that the Village Defendants violated his substantive due process rights by denying him a CO. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Google v Louis Vuitton C-236/08 which considered the degree of ‘neutrality’ on the part of an intermediary. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
Click Here United Parcel Service to Pay $53,931 Civil Penalty to Settle Alleged Violations of Waste Regulations at Lenexa, Kan. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
I have linked each company name to its corresponding record at the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office (or Secretary of the Commonwealth - whatever). [read post]