Search for: "United States v. Corrigan"
Results 1 - 20
of 70
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or… [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 9:30 am
After what must have been a grueling two-hour and 52-minute oral argument on the merits of a challenge to the FTC’s Final Rule banning noncompetes, Judge Timothy Corrigan of the United States Court for the Middle District of Florida issued a ruling from the bench in Properties of the Villages, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
State Building and Construction Trades Council of California, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 10:18 am
Judge Corrigan of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted the plaintiff Properties of the Villages, Inc. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 8:21 am
Terry v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:33 pm
The POUM Clause provides that the legislature may not mandate a new activity or increased level of activity of any unit of local government (such as a school district) unless the State pays the unit of local government for any associated increased costs. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 7:30 am
United States, and Radice v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
In determining whether a search is "unreasonable," a court must adhere to the decisions of the United States Supreme Court articulating the meaning of that word in a similar case. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
Finally, Justice Corrigan would hold that these outcomes do not violate the double jeopardy, due process, or equal protection clauses of the United States and Michigan constitutions. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 4:18 pm
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a “tangible object” (United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
In People v Corrigan, 80 NY2d 326, the court ruled that under both state and federal law any statement made under the threat of dismissal from one's position is protected by the privilege against self-incrimination and is “automatically immunized from use in criminal proceedings. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 8:07 am
Baker (1818) 16 U.S. 541, 545); quite recently, it determined that a fish is not a "tangible object" (United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
" The Unites States Supreme Court in Green Tree Financial Corp. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 1:10 pm
Although the United States Supreme Court at one time interpreted the clause to bar admission of out-of-court statements that lacked adequate indicia of reliability (Ohio v. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 10:03 am
United States, 527 U.S. 1 (1999). [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 2:42 pm
We're all used to the United States Supreme Court and its fractured political composition, which in turn generates lots of dissents -- and often somewhat vitriolic ones, at that. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:45 am
On Wednesday, December 16, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court granted leave to appeal in Foster v. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 9:59 pm
But most notable about United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 7:05 am
The general theme of the dissents was that additional briefing and argument was necessary to consider the implications of the United States Supreme Court decision of Caperton v. [read post]
