Search for: "United States v. Coxe"
Results 101 - 120
of 553
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2006, 7:40 am
" The lawsuit, often described as "Roe v Wade for Men," was filed by Matthew Dubay in the United States District Court at Bay City, Michigan. [read post]
23 May 2017, 9:30 am
” As the district court noted in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 1:04 pm
Cox v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 11:18 am
Cox v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:00 am
United States. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 7:57 am
Sullivan, 532 U.S. 769, 771-72 (2001) (reversing granting of motion to suppress based on officer's alleged "improper subjective motivation"); United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 2:08 pm
United States, 2018 U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:30 am
*A United States District Court judge granted the City’s motion for summary judgment, holding that Matthews had spoken as a public employee and not as a citizen and thus his speech was not protected by the First Amendment.Citing Cox v Warwick Valley Central School District, 654 F3d 267, the 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals said that the test it applied in cases in which a plaintiff asserts a First Amendment retaliation claim requires the plaintiff to establish… [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
Cox:As provided by Title 28, Section 508(B) of the United States Code and Title 28, Section 0.132(A) of the Code of Federal Regulations, I have today assumed the duties of Acting Attorney General.In that capacity I am, as instructed by the President, discharging you, effective a [read post]
12 May 2013, 8:00 am
United States Department of Justice, 2013 U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
United States, in Trump v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 6:36 pm
See R.C.M. 705(c)(1)(B) (“A term or condition in a pretrial agreement shall not be enforced if it deprives the accused of: . . . the complete and effective exercise of post-trial and appellate rights”); see also United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 10:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:05 pm
” Cox v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Since colonial times, anti-miscegenation laws had existed in British North America and, after the Revolutionary War, in the United States. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm
United States (Sacred Sites; Oak Flat/Chi-chil Bildagoteel) Allegany Capital Enteprises, LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:49 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
., Oxford University Press 2015)).Michael John DeBoer, Legislating Morality Progressively -- The Contraceptive Coverage Mandate, Religious Freedom, and Public Health Policy and Ethics, (Journal of Law and Health, Vol. 28, p. 62, 2015).Doug Coulson, British Imperialism, the Indian Independence Movement, and the Racial Eligibility Provisions of the Naturalization Act: United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 8:42 am
United States v. [read post]
