Search for: "United States v. Coxe" Results 141 - 160 of 553
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 6:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268, the court further ruled that Supreme Court had  also properly granted that branch of the employee organization’s motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s amended complaint seeking to recover damages for discrimination "for failure to state a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7). [read post]
13 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Anushka Limaye, Victoria Clark
Arzan Tarapore explained how India can help the United States check China’s rise in region. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:38 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crawford & Anor v Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2012] EWCA Civ 138 (17 February 2012) Oxford City Council v Basey [2012] EWCA Civ 115 (15 February 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AB & Anor v Home Office [2012] EWHC 226 (QB) (16 February 2012) Gold & Anor v Cox & Anor [2012] EWHC 272 (QB) (17 February 2012) Independent Police Complaints Commission v Warner &… [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 7:15 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Did you know that at any given moment, up to 2.3 million citizens are confined in our prisons in the United States? [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act  §§ 301-306). [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 8:03 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Image via WikipediaThe United States District Court for the District of Oregon last week in Obsidian Finance Group, LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:15 am
Amici had expected the Solicitor General to accept the recommendation of the Securities and Exchange Commission that the United States file an amicus brief in support of Petitioner to urge the Court to follow the Commission’s long-standing interpretation of the statutory and regulatory provisions at issue in this case. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:18 am by Ronald Collins and David Skover
Waxman), and certain Democratic Members of the United States House of Representatives (Paul M. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am by INFORRM
Thus, in Cox v Turkey (20 May 2010), the Strasbourg Court held that Article 10 was engaged by the ban on the re-entry of a US woman who had expressed strong views on issues of Kurdish assimilation and the treatment of Armenians. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
New from Hill & Wang: On Democracy's Doorstep: The Inside Story of How the Supreme Court Brought "One Person, One Vote" to the United States, by J. [read post]