Search for: "United States v. Dabney"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2007, 6:00 am
(See Dabney v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:41 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:28 am
State v. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 5:47 pm
If you don't have a venue statute likeSection 1400, you get the kind of litigation experiencesthat are set out in the amici briefs.The -- the law professor's brief noted thatthere's a single judge in the United States that hasone-quarter of all patent cases in the United States onhis docket. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
The "statement of counsel" signed by John Whealan states:Based on my professional judgment, I believe the panel decision is contrary to the following decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States: The Telephone Cases 126 U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:00 am
(Dabney v. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, argued next on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of petitioner. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
As to Miller’s position that Congress has not authorized Mueller’s work by statute, the court simply pointed to United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2006, 2:41 pm
") The other group learned the invention's history first, and was less likely to see the invention as obvious.(...)KSR's lawyer James Dabney, a partner at Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, says that the change doesn't weaken his client's position at all: "The solicitor general of the United States and the Patent and Trademark Office have filed a brief that strongly disagrees with Mr. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 5:15 am
Dabney, supra at 853, 854, quoting Scheer v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 8:01 am
The ruling in KSR v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 3:59 pm
Dabney of Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver, & Jacobson, L.L.P. will argue for petitioner KSR International, and Tom Hungar, Deputy Solicitor General, will argue on behalf of the United States as an amicus in support of petitioner. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:46 pm
Dabney v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:26 am
Circuit wrote: An administrative agency is not subject to Article III of the Constitution of the United States [and] so the petitioner would have had no need to establish its standing to participate in the proceedings before the agency. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:36 am
Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:51 am
Next, the government cites United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:57 pm
Salmonella is one of the most common enteric (intestinal) infections in the United States. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 4:34 am
Salmonella is one of the most common enteric (intestinal) infections in the United States. [read post]
17 May 2022, 10:00 am
In the ruling (Commonwealth v. [read post]
