Search for: "United States v. Daniel Parker"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
Parker Jr., Barrington Daniels Parker Jr., Barrington Parker, Child pornography, Crime, David C. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:48 am
United States Postal Service, in which the court held that the government is not a “person” who can challenge the validity of a patent under the America Invents Act, for this blog. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 5,643,446 entitled FUEL FILTER AND PRIMING PUMP and owned by Parker-Hannifan. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 7:51 am
Patent No. 5,643,446 entitled FUEL FILTER AND PRIMING PUMP and owned by Parker-Hannifan. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
The Newman and Chiasson Case In United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman questioned whether Mueller is an “Officer” of the United States or an “Employee” of the United States in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Lucia v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:04 am
More coverage of Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:32 pm
Altitude Nines, LLC v. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 9:27 pm
In Danielle Seaman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
PARKER New York : Cambridge University Press, 2011 KF395 .P37 2011 See Catalog Communication in law -- United States TONGUE-TIED AMERICA / ROBERT N. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 12:18 am
United States, No. 04-41196 (5th Cir. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has covered the Department of Justice’s plans to restrict the encryption of communications data. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 4:18 am
At Capital Appellate Advocacy, Lawrence Ebner maintains that “[t]he real Supreme Court Bar is not limited to the small number of very talented attorneys who repeatedly handle oral arguments before the Court,” but “is composed of hundreds of attorneys from around the United States who author and file Supreme Court petitions and briefs. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:25 am
Citing Parker v. [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:25 am
Citing Parker v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
How many states have done that? [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am
Parker v. [read post]
