Search for: "United States v. DeRosa"
Results 1 - 11
of 11
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of DeRosa v Dyster, 90 AD3d 1470, a case in which the collective bargaining agreement expressly permitted "grievances concerning retirement benefits" and expressly provided for health insurance benefits after retirement, the majority of DeRosa court held that because only an individual "employee" could file a grievance, DeRosa, a retired employee of City of Niagara Falls, could not have filed a grievance before commencing a CPLR… [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:57 pm
Questions to Guide an Investigation of the Capitol Attack (Just Security, New York University School of Law, January 11, 2021): “The invasion of the United States Capitol was an entirely predictable event, which makes the wholesale security collapse all the more unconscionable. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 4:42 am
DeRosa questioned the validity of Dr. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm
The complaint names as Defendants the New York State Police … former Governor Andrew Cuomo …, Melissa DeRosa …, and Richard Azzopardi …. [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 4:03 pm
Constitutional law experts offer differing opinions on the impact of the case, Brandenburg v. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 3:29 pm
Constitutional law experts offer differing opinions on the impact of the case, Brandenburg v. [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Also in FISC-related transparency news: the FISC declassified as much as it could of its latest business records telephony metadata program; I wrote about two issues dealt with in that order: Judge Claire Eagan’s “relevance” analysis in her August memorandum, and addressing Supreme Court Justices opinions in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm
” United States v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:03 am
The plaintiff had argued that his case is based on the defendant's contractual obligations, and the libel law cases thus don't apply: Plaintiff argues this case is controlled by the United States Supreme Court's holding in Cohen v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 6:22 am
The case, Spokeo v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
