Search for: "United States v. Denmark" Results 81 - 100 of 364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2022, 1:05 pm by Tom Smith
The United States is one of only 12 among the world’s 198 countries that allow abortions for any reason after 20 weeks; 47 out of 50 European countries ban abortions at around 15 weeks. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
The United States of America v Nolan, heard 15 July 2015. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
GuestKat Peter Ling reports on this interesting decision.Richard Vary provides a guest contribution, in which he looks into the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which overturned a decision issued in December 2017 by Judge Selna in the Central District of California, instead going to a jury trial.Trade MarksGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at the recent Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Primart… [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Kennedy with the decision in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 2:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Securities class action litigation has been an important part of the corporate and securities litigation environment in the United States and Canada for many years. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 2:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Securities class action litigation has been an important part of the corporate and securities litigation environment in the United States and Canada for many years. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm by Schachtman
United States Restructured and Revitalized: A Proposal to Amend Federal Evidence Rule 702,” 26 Jurimetrics J. 249, 256 (1986)). [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 2:57 pm by Tobias Thienel
Denmark, no. 17392/90, Commission decision of 14 October 1993).86. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 3:24 am
Germany Claudia Schubert, Whistle-Blowing after Heinisch v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:44 am
United Kingdom decision -- where the claimant faced the death penalty in the United States. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon)   Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance)   Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs… [read post]