Search for: "United States v. DiNapoli"
Results 1 - 20
of 24
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2019, 7:00 am
New York State Comptroller Thomas Dinapoli issued the following audits and reports during the week ending September 6, 2019. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 10:15 am
Matter of Tracy Wolak v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller This Article 78 proceeding was brought about to review a determination of the Comptroller denying petitioner’s application for accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than… [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than… [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 11:13 am
The Appellate Division considered such "wearing two hats at the same time" in Holbrook v Rockland Co, 260 A.D.2d 437, and Nemani v United Health Services, Inc., 170 AD2d 782. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Forfeiture of employee's retirement contributions made to a New York State public retirement system United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:57 am
United States Postal Service, 988 F. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Overtime paid to a police officer for “special-duty” for service performed for a private entity not included in determining the “final average salary” for retirement purposesTamucci v DiNapoli, 2015 NY Slip Op 08027, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentBetween 1989 and 2009, Town and Village of Harrison Police Department [HPD] police sergeant Mark Tamucci was a member of New York State Police and Fire Retirement System [PFRS]. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
"Addressing Petitioner argument that he was erroneously directed to repay the pension benefits mistakenly paid to him, the court said that the Comptroller "had no choice but to seek recoupment of such benefits, as the Comptroller has a duty to correct errors in order to ensure the integrity of the public retirement system", citing Matter of Mowry v DiNapoli, 111 AD3d 1117. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 4:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 5:04 am
., P.C. v DiNapoli, 2014 NY Slip Op 03191, Court of AppealsAmong the patients treated by a physician and a medical group [Providers] were individuals insured by the Empire Plan, New York State's primary health benefit plan. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 12:09 pm
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery described the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm
Army Corps of Engineers the power to regulate the “discharge of dredged and fill material to the waters of the United States. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 12:11 pm
United States case on the Biden administration’s immigration agenda. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm
United States on the Biden administration’s immigration agenda. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 2:15 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice
Court Rules as to Admissibility of Evidence In Trial of Accused Al-Qaida Supporter
United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am
Emma DiNapoli and Jacques Singer-Emery chronicled the latest developments of the military commission in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 2:00 pm
See United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 4:04 am
Circuit’s decision in McKeever v. [read post]