Search for: "United States v. Dow" Results 81 - 100 of 523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2009, 1:01 am
1894Letter.jpg Seventh Circuit holds that the district court was not required to conduct any Daubert analysis before considering handwriting expert testimony during a suppression hearing on whether the defendant's signature appeared on a consent form, in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 10:39 pm
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently held that Major League Baseball's licensing of team logos was subject to rule of reason review under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 4:36 am
On 29 January 2008, NMCCA affirmed the findings and sentence in a published opinion in United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 12:24 pm by WIMS
"    By way of background, Rocky Flats, located near Denver, Colorado, was established by the United States Government in the 1950s to produce nuclear weapon components. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:27 am
This was summarised by HHJ Hacon as a "basic principle of patent law in the United Kingdom" and cited Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical Inc v H. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:14 pm
This case is on appeal from the district court's resentencing of Joseph Story in light of United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 7:26 am
Rule 702 should have settled the debate over Daubert, as this rule for the admissibility of expert testimony is far stricter than any rule that existed  in any jurisdiction in the United States before Daubert came out. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
The United Stated District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held invalid the product configuration mark shown immediately below, for beach towels, finding the circular shape to be functional. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 4:45 pm by Ann Marie Marciarille
A 1979 United States Middle District of Florida injunction prohibiting the release of Medicare data that would identify specific physicians in the name of protection of physician privacy interests  (under the Privacy Act of 1974 and in response to Florida Medical Association, Inc. v. [read post]