Search for: "United States v. Duffy"
Results 41 - 60
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2007, 7:46 pm
United States, 444 U.S. 37, 42 (1979). [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 4:00 pm
; United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:39 pm
July 5, 2011, Jones, J.), United States Middle District Judge John E. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:35 pm
United States (change of venue and pre-trial publicity) Clyma v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:49 am
Here, the company has asserted United States Patent Nos 9,944,945 and 7,838,729. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 2:15 pm
The "statement of counsel" signed by John Whealan states:Based on my professional judgment, I believe the panel decision is contrary to the following decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States: The Telephone Cases 126 U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 6:34 pm
Aldor Solutions Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:43 am
It seems highly likely that Justice Stevens was assigned only two majority opinions to write from the first three sittings because Stevens was also writing the principal dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Roman, J.P., Duffy, Barros and Connolly, JJ., concur. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Roman, J.P., Duffy, Barros and Connolly, JJ., concur. [read post]
1 May 2007, 8:34 am
Here, as we have repeatedly noted, the copies of Windows actuallyinstalled on the foreign computers were not themselves supplied from the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2013, 8:45 pm
United States District Judge William C. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
Journal of the Supreme Court of the United States The Journal of the Supreme Court of the United States contains the “official minutes” of the Court. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 6:24 am
United States, which threw] into doubt his 2006 conviction for fraud and conspiracy. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 11:22 am
In support of the molecular argument, a group of professors led by professors Lemley (Stanford) and Duffy (GWU), looked appropriately at the language of 271(f): [A]s a matter of grammar that the phrase “such components” refers back to the components that have been “supplied” from United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 4:09 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 3:29 am
The appointments clause of the United States Constitution requires that inferior officers be appointed either by the President of the United States, the courts of law or heads of departments. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
Plaintiff also relies on United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:05 am
Microsoft v. [read post]
