Search for: "United States v. Elliott" Results 121 - 140 of 204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 12:57 am by Paul Caron
Commissioner [625 F.3d 254 (5th Cir. 2010)] Consumer Credit Protection Act's Restriction on Garnishment Inapplicable to Tax Debt: United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:08 pm by Stikeman Elliott LLP
In each of the Adopting Jurisdictions, the Instrument imposes Canadian “reporting issuer” type obligations and other additional burdensome requirements on issuers having a class of securities that have been assigned a ticker symbol by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) for quotation on an OTC market in the United States, and that do not otherwise have a class of securities listed or quoted for trading on a recognized North American stock exchange… [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:49 am by utahdefenders
Elliott, 107 F.3d 810, 814 (10th Cir.1997) (quoting United States v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
United States: Dominique Strauss-Kahn, former head of the IMF, has filed a countersuit of defamation against the hotel maid who accused him of sexual assault. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am by Pace Law School Library
  Recent developments in Texas, United States, and international energy law. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:52 am by Sam Murrant
Firstly, a judgment will be issued this Thursday on kettling (Austin and Others v. the United Kingdom; a brief history of the case can be found here) by the Grand Chamber of the ECHR. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Bouchart reports: The landmark ruling stated that although the work of journalist Denis Robert contained inaccuracies, the thoroughness of his investigation and the public interest in the story outweighed the defamatory claims. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
” Chancellor Strine, however, appears to be that rare species of jurist who, unlike the majority of the United States Supreme Court, understands the reality of contingent fee litigation. [read post]