Search for: "United States v. First National Pictures, Inc"
Results 201 - 220
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
United States, 2009 WL 2982969 (S.D. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:21 pm
Golden advances these allegations on behalf of an alleged class of similarly situated individuals who have declared bankruptcy since 2005 across the United States, with loans originated or serviced by the Defendants. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 6:49 am
The Obergefell discussion also includes United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Their approach centers on the idea that Marvel and Disney intellectual properties, especially characters, compete for the attention of the same market. [ 14 ] Several of these analysts point out that Disney has repeatedly tried and failed to capture the young male market share with their characters, especially in the television and film realms, but succeeded with young women. [ 15 ] These analysts point to Marvel’s strong hold on young males and weakness towards female in the comic book… [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Helmsley-Spear, Inc. 4 Vill. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
Judge Moore’s rationale for the court of appeals in Michigan Catholic Conference v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:24 am
Beverages Direct sold the product exclusively to retail purchasers located in the United States. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Stoughton, MA; Michael Munichiello, President) 57 Ten Pictures, Inc. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am
For example, the United States’s general copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author, and Mexico’s duration is 100 years after the death of the author. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 4:51 pm
Scotland The Sunday Herald has a column by Angela Haggerty entitled “The Scottish Law Commission’s draft defamation bill matters to all social media users” United States The Columbia Journalism Review has a piece entitled “Can Trump change the nation’s libel laws? [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm
The first instance judgment is available at [2020] EWHC 1848 (QB). [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
ENDNOTES [1] United States of America v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Oracle America, Inc., No. 18-956. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
The board implemented those recommendations.[16] The Court agreed with the board’s stated reasons for demand refusal, namely that commencing a suit would impair Wyndham’s ability to defend against the FTC suit. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
See United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 11:13 am
Several states have laws that protect off-duty conduct, although it is unclear whether they apply to off-duty communications. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Record labels sue Baidu over providing links to file-sharing sites: (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360), (Copyfight), Merck’s Fosamax patent expires: Watson Pharmaceuticals to distribute authorized generic version, Teva and Barr also launch FDA approved generic versions: (SmartBrief), (Patent Circle), (In … [read post]
