Search for: "United States v. Fitch"
Results 1 - 20
of 112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2015, 11:50 am
" To discuss the case, we have Rachel Paulose, who is a former Senate Confirmed United States Attorney. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:35 am
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which had granted Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) summary judgment in a religious accommodation case brought by a job applicant who wore a headscarf (a hijab) to an interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:13 pm
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 11:45 am
On Monday, June 1, 2015, the United States Supreme Court reversed a judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit which had granted Abercrombie & Fitch (“Abercrombie”) summary judgment in a religious accommodation case brought by a job applicant who wore a headscarf (a hijab) to an interview, but did not mention her religion or request an exception to Abercrombie’s dress code. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 8:25 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
Levi Strauss registered the Arcuate design with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 1943. [read post]
Takeaways From the Facebook Threat and Title VII Head Scarf Cases Handed Down by the Court This Week
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
United States and EEOC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 3:30 am
UPS and EEOC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 7:46 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc., 575 U.S. ____ (2015), the United States Supreme Court delivered the straight-forward rule that employers “may not make an applicant’s religious practice, confirmed or otherwise, a factor in employment decisions. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
”); United States Postal Serv. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 11:35 am
(For Exhibit A, see Burwell v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 8:25 am
” EEOC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Boundas v. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:53 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:01 am
In United States Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:33 am
Last month I reported that United States District Judge Kenneth L. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm
Cir. 2009)International Trade:· United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am
United States, reversing a fisherman’s conviction under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized grouper, garnered significant coverage and commentary. [read post]
