Search for: "United States v. Gear"
Results 101 - 120
of 552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Mar 2019, 3:04 pm
Condemnation for Private Developments In 2005, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled on a case called Kelo v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 2:14 pm
As to Miller’s position that Congress has not authorized Mueller’s work by statute, the court simply pointed to United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 5:35 am
Scheindlin, of United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, will give the ABA TECHSHOW 2007 Keynote Presentation on Thursday, March 22. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:13 am
United States Steel Corp., which clarified what it means for an employee to be “changing clothes” under Section 3(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:31 am
The Supreme Court has unanimously rejected a claim that people working for United States Steel are entitled to compensation for the time spent dressing for work. [read post]
26 Mar 2016, 11:00 am
Anthony v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 10:34 pm
On Wednesday, Apple and others filed a brief opposing the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:28 am
Supreme Court heard argument in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act §§ 301-306). [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 8:48 am
Accts. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:54 pm
In Gear v. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 6:52 am
This past summer, the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Dec 2014, 7:05 am
The United States Supreme Court agreed to take the case. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:30 am
The case, Kasten v. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm
P. 11 and referred the matterof misconduct to the United States Attorney. 996 F. 2d at296–97. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 4:22 am
United States, in which the court held that Congress is required to reimburse health insurance companies for losses created by the Affordable Care Act. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:31 pm
George Crombie, et al., United States District Court for the District of Vermont, Case No. 2:05-cv-302, consolidated with Case No. 2:05-cv-304, dated September 12, 2007. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:48 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:30 pm
In support, Apple cites United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm
United States, 627 A.2d 968, 970 (D.C. 1993) (quoting United States v. [read post]
