Search for: "United States v. General Electric Company" Results 301 - 320 of 738
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2015, 9:02 am by WIMS
 Electric Power Supply Association, et al – Supreme Court Docket Electric Power Supply Asso. v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:00 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> DE Department of Natural Res. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
Army Corps of Engineers to withdraw the controversial "Waters of the United States" proposal. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:49 am
Code makes it a crime, among other things, tobring[] into the United States . . . or knowingly use[] any express company or other common carrier or interactive computer service (as defined in section 230(e)(2) (! [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 11:05 am by Joy Waltemath
Moreover, UPS’s interpretation failed to carry out the important congressional objective in passing the Act—to overturn the Supreme Court’s holding and reasoning in General Electric Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am by WIMS
United States Army Corps of Engineers - 3/23/15. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
EPA's proposed regulation that requires states to dramatically restructure their electricity systems based on how the agency thinks electricity should be produced and used in each state. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:19 am by Gene Killian
  The upgrades may include electrical work; heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) work; and plumbing units. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:17 am by Kevin LaCroix
As FBI Director James Comey eloquently put it, “There are two kinds of big companies in the United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 12:03 pm by Ron Coleman
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board of the United States Patent and Trademark Office reached a decision on March 25th . . . [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 5:08 am
The decision is about likelihood of confusion, reputed trade marks' extended protection, and passing off.* The Naked Truth: use of BARELY THERE wasn't even barely thereAnother Irish Patents Office’s decision that Jeremy reports is HBI Branded Apparel Enterprises LLC v Dunnes Stores Ireland Company. [read post]