Search for: "United States v. General Electric Company" Results 341 - 360 of 738
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 11:39 am by Guest Blogger
  California producers tend to pay a higher price per unit electricity for this cleaner electricity, in addition to other factors. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 10:51 am by Brandon Storm
  Recall that the Obama Administration refused to defend the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(2) Does the ICCTA preempt a state agency’s voluntary commitments to comply with CEQA as a condition of receiving state funds for a state owned rail line and/or leasing state-owned property? [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Not to be taken lightly (Class 99) British government clowning around with patents – but noone’s laughing - ‘New 10% tax on income from patents to boost science development’ (IPKat) (IAM) It’s certainly not contaminated by cheese: Illegal to make Stilton cheese in Stilton (Trademark Blog)   United States US General US Government Accountability Office reviews US overseas IP Attaches (IP Watch) ITC gets the thumbs up – Patent World… [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:02 pm by admin
On June 20, 2011, the high court issued an 8-0 opinion (with Justice Sonia Sotomayor recused) in the case of American Electric Power Co. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Kappos (IP Spotlight) (Patent Docs) Sham patent reexamination action not available in State Court says CAFC: Lockwood v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 7:00 am by Andrew Hamm
General Electric Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:19 am by Gene Killian
  The upgrades may include electrical work; heating, ventilating, and air-conditioning (HVAC) work; and plumbing units. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5684; farewell Gates v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 2:24 am by Schachtman
In addition to the temporal disconnect, the majority gave virtually no consideration to the three-way relationship between the product supplier defendants, the plaintiffs, and the plaintiffs’ employer, the United States government. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
On Monday, April 16, the Court will hear argument in Powerex Corp. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
Ranch royalty rate survey (IP finance) FreePatentsOnline: a remarkable symmetry - 'Flash of Genius' sponsorship of Patent Plaque Program (IP finance) Managing external patent specialists (Innovationpartners) The first step to generating revenue from 'patent monetisation' is understanding what the term means (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Think business cannot predict the future? [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 11:11 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-5165 Issue: Whether Richardson v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Paul Morgan controlled several banks, Western Union, the Pullman Car Company, Aetna Life Insurance, General Electric and 2-1 railroad companies. [read post]