Search for: "United States v. Gleeson" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2008, 7:55 am
  But United States District Court Judge John Gleeson of the Eastern District of New York could make me eat my words. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 12:45 am by Indefensible
Thanks to my old colleague Frank for passing this to me:Some Excerpts from United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:21 am by Bill Otis
Lynch, who is the United States attorney for the Eastern District of New York, to request that she vacate two of Mr. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 9:46 am
Just after this blog highlighted Judge Gleeson's thoughtful decision in Surgent holding that personal money judgments are not authorized in forfeiture proceedings, see here, the Second Circuit rules otherwise in United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 10:24 pm
Throwing out the convictions of Robert Simels’ associate for witness tampering among other charges, EDNY Judge Gleeson found in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:39 am
In 2001 petitioner appellee Jane Doe was convicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Gleeson, J.) of health care fraud and was sentenced principally to five years’ probation. ... [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:49 am by David Oscar Markus
From his order (via Professor Berman's site):Last year in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 4:22 am by SHG
  Via Doug Berman, his decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm by David Markus
After all, as a circuit judge wrote in 2009, “[t]he Judicial Conference of the United States for almost 20 years, and the Sentencing Commission for almost 10 years, have pleaded with the judiciary committees of Congress to do something about the serious injustices that these long, mandatory minimum sentences impose – to no avail. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm by David Oscar Markus
"[I]n determining whether reforms are needed, and especially in determining whether the existing guideline should be burdened with even more adjustments, the Commission should examine whether our system already provides an adequate solution for the claimed 'unacceptable' outcomes the Department complains about," Gleeson wrote in United States v. [read post]