Search for: "United States v. Griffith"
Results 161 - 180
of 297
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2014, 6:44 am
” Pointing to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v Stanley, the appellate panel explained that no Bivens remedy is available for injuries that “arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service. [read post]
20 May 2014, 3:00 pm
The Advisory discusses the recent oral argument in In United States ex rel. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:50 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:43 am
But the Second Circuit got a heaping pile of weird in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 11:56 am
Discusssion with staff reflected that there had been some shortage and that one dorm lost both the JCO V and VI" (which are supervisory positions)." [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:30 pm
A description from the Press:In 2011, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1973, authorizing its member states to take measures to protect Libyan civilians from Muammar Gadhafi’s forces. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 2:25 pm
Griffith. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:19 pm
Hardy, and United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 11:23 am
Griffith, and Senior Judge Stephen F. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 pm
When Tatel pressed further, Gershengorn seemed to agree that this would doom the United States’s position. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 7:54 pm
United States, and I have very little of substance to add to Jen Daskal’s thorough analysis over at Just Security, or Marty Lederman’s addendum thereto. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:19 am
United States. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 4:30 am
Secretary of State for the proposition that a Provisional Agreement between the United States and Saudi Arabia allows appellant Shaker Aamer to invoke international law to challenge the conditions of his confinement. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:49 pm
Under the retroactivity rule of Griffith v. [read post]
19 Feb 2013, 11:45 pm
Griffith, et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 5:59 pm
Erwin Griswold, Law and Lawyers in the United States, 65 (Cambridge, Harv. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A woman v The Mail on… [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm
Recess appointments are permitted in Article II, Section 2, clause 3 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:32 am
The challenge was based on the United States Supreme Court's 2010 case New Process Steel, L.P. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
The member states are furthermore in a position to balance conflicting rights and interests, such as the right of freedom of expression under Article 10 of the Convention with the right of property as protected by Article 1 of the First Protocol to the Convention. [read post]
