Search for: "United States v. Harmon"
Results 301 - 320
of 595
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2020, 9:33 am
The CAFC finds no judicial estoppel: Prior to claim construction, and alongside an ongoing inter partes review (“IPR”) proceeding, Egenera separately petitioned the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) to remove one of the eleven listed inventors from the ’430 patent. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
" That, in essence is the core of the issue (nicely dressed up in the increasingly arcane language of American constitutional law) addressed in the various opinions in the Hobby Lobby case (Burwell v. [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 6:00 am
Part V will consider the meaning of the phrase "Office . . . under the United States," which appears in the Incompatibility Clause, the Impeachment Disqualification Clause, the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and the Elector Incompatibility Clause. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:15 am
Dep’t of Revenue; Dep’t of Revenue v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 1:35 pm
How is national autonomy to be balanced with harmonization in the regulation of PIL? [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
” The proposal for a new regulation would harmonize the rules on beneficial ownership and clarify essential aspects. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 10:54 am
This court's jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of United States district courts is based on 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
Importantly, Chapter V of the GDPR authorizes only three methods for legal data transfers from the EEA to a third country, such as the United States: adequacy decisions, appropriate safeguards or limited enumerated exceptions (“derogations”). [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 9:47 am
Since 1982, patent cases, unlike most other cases in our federal system, have all been appealed to one court, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 6:01 am
Part V will consider the meaning of the phrase "office . . . under the United States," which appears in the Incompatibility Clause, the Impeachment Disqualification Clause, the Foreign Emoluments Clause, and the Elector Incompatibility Clause. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:04 pm
Doing so will both further the general policy of treating unsecured creditors equally and help harmonize the liquidation authority with the Bankruptcy Code, under which the priorities for any unsecured claims are construed narrowly precisely because of the overall goal of treating all unsecured creditors equitably, citing the Supreme Court’s opinion in Begier v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
Penn State Law, Course Descriptions. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
The Court disagreed, ruling that “an authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the Patent Act. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 2:34 pm
Pajares v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 3:21 pm
The lock washers subject to this investigation are currently classifiable under subheading 7318.21.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 10:18 am
They become part of international law, and in the United States, treaties have the same force as federal law. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
(United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:41 pm
That discussion is as possible within non-state governance units as it is within states. [read post]
Appellate Court Shuts Out Trial Court in CEQA/ESA Double Header under Deferential Standard of Review
3 Apr 2014, 11:08 am
Both federal and state environmental review were necessitated for the project, however the appellate court only reviewed the relevant state law issues. [read post]
