Search for: "United States v. Harmon"
Results 101 - 120
of 592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
For instance, there is no provision like Article 1, Section 8, clause 8 of the United States Constitution in any of the treaties establishing the TEU that protects intellectual property rights like the United States does.[39] While the ultimate goal is to harmonize all Member States in their approach to intellectual property rights, such a goal has not yet been entirely attained. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 1:51 pm
After the announcement that David Kappos was nominated for the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), there has been much speculation about possible reform programs that Kappos may enact. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:40 pm
United States (9th Cir. 1943) 139 F.2d 973, 974.) [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:36 pm
Rather, it is classifiable in 6217.10.9530, Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS), which provides for "Other made up clothing accessories; parts of garments…Accessories: Other: Other: Of man-made fibers. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:19 am
Harmon Stores, Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 11:10 am
Earlier today, a number of international and foreign associations and copyright scholars filed an Amicus brief in the Supreme Court of the United States in the ABC, Inc. et al v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 9:08 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 12:34 am
This Kat has reviewed the The "Research Handbook on Patent Law Theory", second edition Edward Elgar Publishing, edited by Toshiko Takenaka offers a comparative approach by which salient issues of patent law are discussed from the principal vantage of three major jurisdictions, the United States, Europe and Japan. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 5:33 am
Harmon Stores, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:39 am
United States v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 3:54 pm
In the United States, the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”) governs the classification of imported goods and merchandise and provides the applicable tariff rates. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:24 am
Case Citation: Will Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 1:03 am
iii.That unit should also oversee and coordinate the harmonization process between ARIPO and OAPI [this harmonisation process is one to watch. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 2:53 pm
Accordingly, the Court of International granted summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
United States was not, after oral argument, much of a surprise. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:30 am
State v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 10:47 am
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Badgerow v. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:23 am
Recently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, decided SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. [read post]
