Search for: "United States v. Hum" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
Thеrе are оnlу fіftу GS-13-ranked іndіvіduаlѕ іn the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am by Kit Chong Ng
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Apparently, if you hummed Patrick a few lines from a popular song of the day, he quickly had the gist of the tune and, in a short time, the whole room would be singing along. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
CBS News is reporting that an official of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and his wife suffered from a similar attack as the diplomats in Cuba. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 8:35 am
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:44 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-1503, and Overton v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
  And, indeed, as an investor operating in the private sector, the ability of the Norwegian SWF to assert some considerable influence on the way in which the Duke Board responds to its responsibilities to respect hum ab rights, including the human rights associated with environmental degradation, should have been an important element in the Ethics Council's calculus. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:40 am by Mark Murakami
 Under 49 U.S.C. 1131, the NTSB has authority to investigate: a major marine casualty (except a casualty involving only public vessels) occurring on or under the navigable waters, internal waters, or the territorial sea of the United States as described in Presidential Proclamation No. 5928 of December 27, 1988, or involving a vessel of the United States (as defined in section 2101 (46)  [1] of title 46), under regulations prescribed jointly by the Board… [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
As I discussed here, the Fourth Circuit recently ruled in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 12:35 pm by Schachtman
The Senate Committee report highlights the hypocrisy of some critics of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in, Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
 The Court, explicitly recognizing the relationship between suggestiveness and mistakes in identification has repeatedly expressed concern that police arranged identification procedures may alter a witness’s memory rendering the subsequent identification testimony unreliable (United States v Wade, 388 US 218 [1967], Stovall v Denno, 388 US 293 [1967]; Simmons v United States, 390 US 377 [1968]; Manson v Braithwaite,… [read post]