Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission" Results 241 - 260 of 331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2007, 10:12 am
(d) Guidelines by Attorney General Not later than one year after August 23, 1988, the Attorney General, after consultation with the Commission, the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of the Treasury, and after obtaining the views of all interested persons through public notice and comment procedures, shall determine to what extent compliance with this section would be enhanced and… [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
Brown (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Freedom Holdings et al.Reply brief for the petitioners Title: Lay v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
It states that a site is not subject to action under the bill if it “engages in an activity that would not make the operator liable for monetary relief for infringing the copyright under section 512 of title 17, United States Code. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
Toys “R” Us sold about twenty-percent of the toys in the United States and in some metropolitan areas, it sold up to almost half of the toys. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has held and the United States has repeatedly urged, contrary to the decision below. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am by Stephen Wermiel
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff Charles Slaughter alleges that the CON regime, including the moratoria, violates the equal protection and substantive due process clauses of the United States and Mississippi Constitutions. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 10:14 am by John Elwood
”  United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Schachtman
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
The railroad regulatory agency—the Interstate Commerce Commission, established in 1887—was abolished in 1985. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Nothing in this Act shall apply to any of the following:(1) Actions or transactions specifically authorized by laws administered by any regulatory body or officer acting under statutory authority of this State or the United States.815 Ill. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 12:07 pm by Andrew Hamm
Two, that the enterprise was or would be engaged in, or its activities affected or would affect interstate commerce. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
In December 1917, the Interstate Commerce Commission "recommended federal control of the railroad industry" to improve its effectiveness and the President nationalized the railroads later that month. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:47 am by Sasha Volokh
A statute authorized a private group, the American Railway Association, to "designate to the Interstate Commerce Commission the standard height of drawbars for freight cars. [read post]