Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission"
Results 141 - 160
of 331
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) made two key announcements in September of 2017. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
Association of Irritated Residents v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
Ohio is one of only five states with a statewide gross receipts tax, but faced with declining corporate income tax revenues, other states are beginning to look to the Ohio CAT as a model. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am
On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court held that a buyer of defaulted consumer debt was not subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 8:17 am
On June 12, 2017, the United States Supreme Court held that a buyer of defaulted consumer debt was not subject to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”). [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 7:37 am
Importation counts as introduction into interstate commerce, so the approval requirement applies. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
He has also cited and relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
This case includes the following issues: (1) Does the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act [ICCTA] (49 U.S.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 11:54 am
In two cases decided on December 19, 2016, United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 5:43 am
The most well-known case brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, to date, has been United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 12:42 pm
BNSF Railway has denied these claims, and also argues that the CWA, in this instance, is preempted by the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act, 49 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:45 am
Thus, because they sold unregistered securities through the United States mail or interstate commerce these defendants were liable unless they could prove an exemption. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:43 am
" Over the course of 100 pages, Alex provides a powerful historical and analytical defense of Congress's ability to go beyond the strict confines of existing international law when exercising this power, and to prohibit private conduct that violates international law, as well as any private conduct that, while itself not illegal under international law, the United States has a duty to punish under international law. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 6:28 am
Interstate Commerce Commission, 978 F.2d 737, 740 (D.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
District Court for the Southern District of Florida indicted Rutgerson with one count of:`using any facility and means of interstate commerce, [to] knowingly attempt to persuade, induce, entice, and coerce an individual who had not attained the age of eighteen years, to engage in prostitution or any sexual activity for which a person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2422(b). [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
However, five justices did agree that Congress could not use the Interstate Commerce Power to regulate non-acts, omissions. [read post]
