Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission" Results 161 - 180 of 331
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2016, 3:30 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  This is the "jurisdictional" provision, generally an effect on interstate commerce or commission in a place of federal jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
Toys “R” Us sold about twenty-percent of the toys in the United States and in some metropolitan areas, it sold up to almost half of the toys. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
Toys “R” Us sold about twenty-percent of the toys in the United States and in some metropolitan areas, it sold up to almost half of the toys. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
Toys “R” Us sold about twenty-percent of the toys in the United States and in some metropolitan areas, it sold up to almost half of the toys. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 522 F.3d 937, 940 (9th Cir. 2008); see United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 9:04 am by Eugene Volokh
Class G airspace is part of the navigable airspace the regulation of which substantially affects interstate commerce. 7. [read post]
Most all agree that the United States Supreme Court will ultimately decide the question of the legitimacy of the Rule. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:26 am
” entries refer to sections of the United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual, which you can find here, and which sets out the factors and standards that factor into federal sentencing. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
The Chief Justice stated that “[s]elling produce in interstate commerce, although certainly subject to reasonable governmental regulation, is not a special governmental benefit that the Government may hold hostage, to be ransomed by the waiver of constitutional protection”. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 5:29 am
  As to the former, the opinion explains that[Heleniak] was charged with transportation of child pornography in interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am by JB
Co., 96 U.S. 1 (1877), the court held that Congress could regulate telegraph communication as part of its powers to regulate foreign and interstate "commerce. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
United States 14-1145Issue: Whether, under Holland v. [read post]
McComb, a United States Supreme Court case decided in 1947 regarding the jurisdiction of the DOT’s predecessor, the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”). [read post]
McComb, a United States Supreme Court case decided in 1947 regarding the jurisdiction of the DOT’s predecessor, the Interstate Commerce Commission (“ICC”). [read post]