Search for: "United States v. Jewell" Results 161 - 180 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2016, 6:13 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Jewell (Indian Long-Term Leasing Act; Property Rights)Pearson v. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 6:43 am by William Ford
United States or permitted by its ruling in Munaf v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:27 am by Lyle Denniston
For the second time in recent years, the Supreme Court has turned to the federal government for advice on whether lawsuits should be allowed to go forward to fix legal blame for the deaths, injuries and property damage done by the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 10:30 pm
As the United States Supreme Court wrote in Chessman v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:01 pm
The State presented Sergeant Steven Schafer of the IMPD Computer and Digital Forensic Unit to testify as an expert in forensic analysis of social media records and digital trails. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 7:20 pm by Cyrus Farivar
Jess Loughborough In a new federal court filing, the Electronic Frontier Foundation has asked for a preservation order similar to one that it already received years ago in one National Security Agency-related case (Jewel v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:55 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> National Environmental Dev v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 9:48 am by Susan Brenner
As Wikipedia notes, until the “1960s, mens rea in the United States was a very slippery, vague, and confused concept” because it was based on common law. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:05 am by Seth Jaffe
Jewell, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia vacated the 2008 rule issued by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, which had itself revised the 1983 stream buffer zone rule. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 8:58 am by Schachtman
Rufe is a judge on the United States District Court, for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:48 am by Ron Coleman
Jewel’s ad, the opinion states, served two goals: to congratulate Jordan and to promote the grocery store chain. [read post]