Search for: "United States v. Kates" Results 21 - 40 of 294
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2016, 3:55 am by INFORRM
The cases below were referred to in the Court’s judgment: – Halford v the United Kingdom (25 June 1997), which concerned an office landline designated for personal use. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 12:39 pm
Pakistan) Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International LawJean Galbraith, Contemporary Practice of the United States Relating to International Law Recent Books on International LawPenelope Andrews, reviewing Research Handbook on Feminist Engagement in International Law, edited by Susan Harris Rimmer and Kate Ogg Michael Matheson, reviewing Internationalized Armed Conflicts in International Law, by Kubo Mačák … [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 4:39 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Executive Authority to Exclude Aliens: In Brief, Kate M. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 7:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Faleomavaega Panel 7 — Policing Violence against Indian Women — Sarah Deer, Christi Belcourt, Sam Hirsch Panel 8 — Tribes, States, and Taxes — Gabriel Galanda, Shana Barehand, Mary Streitz Break-out Panel 1 — United States v. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:09 pm
Thus, the premium associated with trading in the United States was roughly constant, while the premium associated with being subject to U.S. regulation declined. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”This conception of clemency is continuous with a line of cases going back to the first United States Supreme Court case on clemency in 1833.That case, United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states, and Culbertson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:25 am by Lisa Baird
In a decision with significant potential ramifications for flows of personal data from the European Union to the United States, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its judgment in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (Case C-362/14) that the Safe Harbor Decision no longer provides adequate protection for data transferred between the EU and the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:45 am by SHG
The day Cox received the terrible news about her fetus, the Texas Supreme Court was hearing oral arguments in Zurawski v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Hargraves and Title IX   Book Session: Doctors and Demonstrators: How Political Institutions Shape Abortion Law in the United States, Britain and Canada, by Drew Halfmann  Ziad Munson -- DiscussantZakiya Luna -- DiscussantDrew Halfmann -- Creator, Organizer, AuthorIsaac Martin -- Chair, DiscussantDrew Halfmann  -- Author Southern Law  Tamara Myers -- Network Rep, Creator, OrganizerBarry Godfrey -- Chair, DiscussantMegan Francis, The Strange Fruit of the… [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, United States v. [read post]