Search for: "United States v. Lebowitz"
Results 1 - 20
of 51
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2012, 2:03 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 5:29 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Lewis was among those legal advisors disqualified by the order: “We just stopped working on anything involved with United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 10:12 am
Lebowitz asks the court to impose the remedy that was proposed on Monday under United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 11:15 pm
Keenan, Cooper, Lebowitz and Lerer challenge this presumption by undertaking a detailed analysis of these procedures in all fifty states. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:48 pm
United States, 137 U.S. 342, 346 (1890). [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 12:53 pm
United States, sought to hold the federal government liable for a medication error at a Veterans’ Affairs (VA) hospital that allegedly caused a man severe and permanent brain damage. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 9:35 am
The new case, United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 7:39 am
United States Department of Health and Human Service, U.S. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 10:29 am
In the case, OBB Personenverkehr AG (OBB) v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:58 am
United States, No. 1:14-cv-00055, complaint (S.D. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:44 am
Torres v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:44 am
The United States Supreme Court heard arguments this week in a case in which Missouri prosecutors asked the Court to rule that warrants are not necessary to collect blood samples from individuals suspected of driving while intoxicated. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:02 am
The defendant objected to the expert’s opinion, and the trial court ruled that his testimony was not applicable to the standard of care that the plaintiff was entitled to receive in the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 9:29 am
There are approximately 1.3 million people in the United States injured by medication errors every year. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:02 am
The defendant objected to the expert’s opinion, and the trial court ruled that his testimony was not applicable to the standard of care that the plaintiff was entitled to receive in the United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 10:34 am
In the case, Scott v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 9:15 am
United States, 478 F.2d 1210, 1213 (Ct. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 2:45 pm
United States, No. [read post]
11 Dec 2012, 2:42 pm
The court stated the FDA might pursue a number of alternatives without excessive First Amendment restrictions. [read post]
