Search for: "United States v. Lemon"
Results 81 - 100
of 203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2018, 7:47 am
John’s United Church of Christ v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:58 am
ACLU of Kentucky or the dreaded Lemon v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
As explained in the case of United Biscuits v Asda [1997] RPC 513, customers might be misled by the similarities of get-up, confusion has a broad interpretation and does not require an intention to deceive. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Janus v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 6:03 pm
BancorpSouth v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 11:58 am
Brown v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 10:23 am
As similar cases arise in various circuits across the United States, the DOL’s response to the decision will likely be guided by whether other circuits give deference to such guidance. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 8:07 am
These decisions relate only to aliens appealing individual denials of entry into the United States. . . . [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 2:31 pm
* Indiana Jones v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 12:30 am
The judge wielded a "broad axe" and assessed the loss of profits at £14.45 per unit x 1,755 units i.e. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
At this point, Justice Fruchter jumped in to recite the three prongs of the test first articulated in Lemon v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:31 am
United States; and Coolidge v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:56 am
But perhaps the Chief Justice’s highest-profile case was United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm
§ 337(a) (“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of [the FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States”); see POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari The government begins its statement by citing United States ex rel. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
” He had previously visited the United States in 1962 and 1968 even though, by statute, his political beliefs rendered him inadmissible. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am
The order’s focus faces outward towards the alien residents of the subject countries, not inward towards persons in the United States like the plaintiffs . . . . [read post]
27 May 2017, 6:17 am
Applying Lemon, Judge Gregory found that a reasonable observer would likely conclude the Order's primary purpose was to exclude individuals from the United States on the basis of their religion, in violation of the Establishment Clause. [read post]
