Search for: "United States v. Lilly"
Results 41 - 60
of 386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
This Kat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in the case of Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 10:28 am
§ 271(e)(4)(B), Panacea be permanently enjoined from making, using, selling or offering to sell any of its accused products within the United States, or, where applicable, importing accused products into the United States prior to the expiration of the '703 and '325 patents;• That, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
Eli Lilly & Co. back to West Virginia state courts on Tuesday, September 9. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:03 pm
Eli Lilly and Co., United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (2010-1105). [read post]
19 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
For instance, in its recent Discussion Paper on Online Copyright Infringement, the Australian Government wrote that "Australia is obliged under its free trade agreements with the United States, Singapore and Korea (not yet ratified) to provide a legal incentive to ISPs to cooperate with rights holders to prevent infringement on their systems and networks. [read post]
16 May 2009, 3:51 am
EEO/iNews from the United States Supreme Court - Thursday, May 14, 2009Source: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 9:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
Seventh Circuit Upholds Preliminary Injunction Issued in Favor of Elanco US, Inc. Against Arla Foods
21 Jun 2018, 8:02 am
Lilly-v-Arla-Opinion [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 1:28 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 5:11 pm
Related posts: Argument Day in Bilski at US Supreme CourtLater today the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Bilski matter. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 2:22 pm
The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was initiated by Congress in reaction to the United States Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Ledbetter v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 6:23 am
Facts: This case (David Lillie v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:00 pm
" The Court focused on the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in the ruling this month, a bill that extends the time period in which employees can pursue equal compensation lawsuits, and restores the law that existed for years in regions all over the United States, including Southern California, prior to the Ledbetter v. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:58 am
Readers interested in patent law will be familiar with last summer's decision of the UK Supreme Court in Actavis v Eli Lilly [2017] UKSC 48. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:00 pm
In Alexander v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 8:16 am
Eli Lilly petitioned for a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Northern District of California to vacate its order transferring this case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
Since its release in 1999, Actos has generated more than $16 billion in sales for Lilly and Takeda, who partnered together to produce and market the drug in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:17 am
Since its release in 1999, Actos has generated more than $16 billion in sales for Lilly and Takeda, who partnered together to produce and market the drug in the United States. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 11:34 am
In Cubist v. [read post]
