Search for: "United States v. Louisville" Results 121 - 140 of 276
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2012, 3:51 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  KV further states that it employs personnel in the United States in positions ranging from specialized technical research and development staff to marketing and administrative staff. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 7:27 am by Steven Boutwell
The plaintiff subsequently filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeal for the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:07 am by New Books Script
KF 505 ZC2 D528 2012 Family law, gender and the state / Alison Diduck and Felicity Kaganas. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Vanderbilt University, 287 S.W.2d 32, 34 (Tenn. 1956) (“[p]unitive damages . . . are allowed as a mere penalty”; “[a] mere penalty never vests but remains executory”); Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 11:09 pm
Incidence of Acute, Symptomatic Hepatitis A – United States, 1980-2008 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Vanderbilt University, 287 S.W.2d 32, 34 (Tenn. 1956) (“[p]unitive damages . . . are allowed as a mere penalty”; “[a] mere penalty never vests but remains executory”); Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:17 pm by darren
COLORADO) The Office of the United States Trustee  999 Eighteenth Street, Suite 1551 Denver, Colorado 80202 Phone: (303) 312-7230  [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by Pace Law School Library
:  the failure of safe drinking waterenforcement in the United States. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 8:19 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Milwaukeeans had to wait until December 12 to learn that the United States Supreme Court had denied the state’s petition for certiorari. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 11:56 am
Indiana Code 1-3-1-1 provides: Upon the approval and consent of the Congress of the United States to the compact hereby effected, the boundary line between the State of Indiana and the Commonwealth of Kentucky is as follows: Commencing at a point on the line between Sections 15 and 14, Township 7 South, Range 10 West, and 67.25 chains south of the northeast corner of Section 15, the same being the beginning point in the description of the part of the boundary line as… [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:10 am by SHG
  Congress did not make the reduction retroactive, while asserting that the change was needed because the law was patently unfair.As Judge Evans explained in his decision for a unanimous 7th Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
United States Soccer Federation denies extending antitrust immunity to USSF in regulating professional soccer, 18 SPORTS LAWYERS JOURNAL 325 (2011)Caitlin M. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
Lost in the coverage of high-profile budget battles, the United States Supreme Court has issued three extremely anti-consumer, anti-worker and anti-plaintiff decisions this term that directly threaten our ability to represent injured clients. [read post]