Search for: "United States v. Marion" Results 101 - 120 of 282
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm by Lorenzo d’Aubert, Eric Halliday
§ 1182(a)(6)(E), which provides that “[a]ny alien who at any time knowingly has encouraged, induced, assisted, abetted, or aided any other alien to enter or to try to enter the United States in violation of law is inadmissible. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:35 am by Lawrence Solum
Then it will discuss the history of voter access in the United States, with a focus on Harper v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Dissent in the Mylan case (by Lourie, joined by Newman and Moore): Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia in No. 1:17-cv-00116- IMK-JPM, Judge Irene M. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 2:31 pm by Michele Goodwin
The Page Act, which restricted Chinese women from entering the United States, is a part of this shameful legacy. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 7:48 am
Fairbanks sought a ruling as a matter of law that the Harrolds' claims fall within the scope of the state's Medical Malpractice Act. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 11:03 pm by Aparajita Lath
The book not only enlightens the reader as to the approach of the Indian legal system to the scope of these rights and their protection but also discusses the law in common law jurisdictions such as the United States, United Kingdom, Singapore and Australia. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for cerebral palsy. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:16 am by Cody M. Poplin
And while the United States is still floundering for a strategy, the United Kingdom just released its own public strategy to combat the Islamic State. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court affirmed a lower-court judgment holding that Congress properly delegated authority in the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act to the U.S. attorney general to apply the law’s registration requirements, suggests that “[t]he more conservative justices, aligned with the dissent, favor disciplining the administrative state but not the national security president. [read post]