Search for: "United States v. Michael Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 427
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
Bouarfa petitioned United States Citizenship and Immigration Services for a visa that would permit her husband to remain in the country permanently. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 10:43 am
From Norgren v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
” The regulator found that programmes presented by Jacob Rees-Mogg, Esther McVey and Philip Davies were news segments that which had no “exceptional justification. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 3:17 am
Meanwhile, nations like China mandate official sanctions before any AI service circulation, and within the United States, some states have crafted laws that address AI’s implementation in policing and corporate settings. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Jefferson Davis: President of the United States? [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
Specifically, it concluded, the presidency is not an “office … under the United States,” and the president is not an “officer of the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:19 pm
See, Taylor 495 U.S. at 600; United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
It so happens that last week, United States District Court Judge Michael M. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Nelson, Harvard Law School Businesses in the United States are increasingly supporting regulation and regulators against judicial decisions curtailing agency authority. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" And in Trump v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
” This exclusionary criterion ensures lack of viewpoint diversity, and makes the Collegium an effective proxy for the law industry in the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
The class spent the entire semester on United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
United States. [read post]
