Search for: "United States v. Munoz" Results 41 - 60 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2007, 1:15 pm
  The superceding indictments did not relate back because, "The government ‘is not limited in its proof at trial to those overt acts alleged in the indictment.' United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 1:23 am by Editor
6th.admend.png In a bank fraud prosecution, bank board minutes were admitted under FRE 803(7) to show the non-existence of information; in particular, that the board did not receive material information about certain loan transactions, in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 7:06 am
Munoz, 233 F.3d 1117 (9th Cir. 2000), and United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:12 pm by Russell Mace
Munoz, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit determined that a district court could consider a defendant's background, characteristics and conduct, thus, a court may refer to a defendant's alienage. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Sue the clowns In another June 2023 decision in Munoz v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:00 am
Although these witnesses did not quantify the exact cost of the many hours of labor expended, the United States introduced Exhibit 6 to make such a quantification. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:16 am
But the court’s ultimate justification, though it did not play it up as such, is this line it quotes from Munoz v. [read post]