Search for: "United States v. Oakley"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 3:11 am
Property, LLC v Butler County, OH, 2023 WL 3270901 (6th Cir. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 7:38 am
In 2023, Oakley raised a record €2.85 billion for Oakley Capital Fund V, bringing their total AUM to €8 billion.About Bain Capital CreditBain Capital Credit is a leading global credit specialist with approximately $42 billion in assets under management. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 7:27 am
In 2023, Oakley raised a record €2.85 billion for Oakley Capital Fund V, bringing their total AUM to €8 billion. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:47 am
United States On 21 February 2023, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case of Gonzalez v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Oakley Capital, whose founder and managing partner is the reportedly significant British Conservative Party donor, Peter Dubens, at least for a while, has acquired majority ownership of v-Lex, as the latter continues to innovate and embed itself in markets. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:35 am
Oakley represented Ogden, while U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 8:57 am
: Password-sharing is a “ubiquitous, useful, and generally harmless” activity that “millions of people” engage in, United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 11:57 pm
Case date: 07 August 2019 Case number:No. 18-10157 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:37 am
United States Auto Club Inc., Opposition No. 91229632 (June 5, 2019) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Marc A. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 3:26 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 10:54 am
Facts: This case (Hutchens et al v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:46 am
EU Regulations are directly effective in all member states. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 11:31 pm
This precedent setting case, State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:48 am
– Kirsten Sjøvoll Facebook’s Community Standards: Severed heads are okay, but nipples are bad (unless accompanied by a baby) – Gideon Benaim and Jon Oakley United States: Facebook, Cyberbullying and the First Amendment – Susan Brenner So, welcome back to our readers. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
”); United States Postal Serv. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 3:56 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
Eric Williams, George Sochan, Bowie State University COMMENTS: Nancy Ellenberger, United States Naval Academy RED, WHITE, AND BLACK: CONSTRUCTING NINETEENTH-CENTURY RACIAL IDENTITIESPRESIDING: Amy Dru Stanley, University of Chicago Unintended Consequences: Restricting Notions of Whiteness in Maryland during the Early National Period, Patricia A. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 1:07 pm
See Oakley v. [read post]