Search for: "United States v. One Parcel of Real Property With Buildings" Results 41 - 60 of 110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2013, 5:41 pm by Law Lady
Al., Appellees. 4th District.Contracts -- Conveyance of real property -- Limitation of actions -- Where agreement between school board and property owner clearly and unambiguously required owner to deed to school board by a specified date forty acres of land meeting certain outlined conditions, owner breached the agreement on the specified date when owner failed to deed a compliant forty-acre parcel to the school board -- Statute of limitations not tolled by… [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
The pre-sale inspection procedure usually requires the property owner to complete an application, schedule and appear for an inspection of the property with a code official, pay an inspection fee, and correct or otherwise address identified violations of the municipality’s fire, zoning, building, and/or property maintenance codes in order to obtain a certificate of occupancy authorizing the property’s sale or rental. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:39 pm
The pre-sale inspection procedure usually requires the property owner to complete an application, schedule and appear for an inspection of the property with a code official, pay an inspection fee, and correct or otherwise address identified violations of the municipality’s fire, zoning, building, and/or property maintenance codes in order to obtain a certificate of occupancy authorizing the property’s sale or rental. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm by Patricia Salkin
Tuscola argued that it held leases to develop and use the parcels covered by its SLUP application, and therefore had an interest in the use and possession of real estate. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Together the corporations owned 18 residential apartment buildings (mostly walk-up tenements) and one undeveloped land parcel located mostly in Manhattan's Upper East Side. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 12:51 pm by Stuart Kaplow
” The stated purpose of the ASTM Standard E1527-21 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment process is “to define good commercial and customary practice in the United States of America for conducting an environmental site assessment of a parcel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm by admin
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 10:16 am by Arthur F. Coon
  “[P]eriodic bouts of litigation in federal district court, starting in 1975” – with Martha’s regulatory taking action seeking $6 million for County’s downzoning of its property from a minimum of 300 to a maximum of 27 units – resulted in “two stipulated judgments, one in 1976, the other in 2007[,]” the “most significant aspect [of which] was that the County twice solemnly – and publicly – agreed to… [read post]
9 Sep 2006, 4:51 am
  They own two parcels of residential real estate in Contra Costa County. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 am
United States, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit , 2007-5169, March 12, 2009.) [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 7:20 am by Schachtman
  The problem, of course, is that how one selects data of past performance to project future performance is part and parcel of the methodology of making the economic projection. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 8:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
An O'Shea, 8 NY3d at p. 3, the Court stated: "Article 18 allowed special assessing units to apply different fractional assessment percentages to each of four classes of property: one-, two- and three-family residential property (class one); all other residential property except hotels and motels and other similar commercial property (class two); utility property (class three); and all other (class four) (see… [read post]
Most all agree that the United States Supreme Court will ultimately decide the question of the legitimacy of the Rule. [read post]