Search for: "United States v. Pedro"
Results 1 - 20
of 136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2010, 1:53 am
Pedro v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Court of Appeal “In order to maintain the freedom of movement or EC workers, the Department of Work and Pensions was obliged to treat a dependent family member of an EU national, who retained his UK worker status, as living in Great Britain for the dependant’s eligibility for a United Kingdom pension credit. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:32 am
Mere Descriptiveness: Both Opposers testified that they escaped from Cuba to the United States in a program organized by the United States government and dubbed "Operation Pedro Pan. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 9:19 am
Which reads:"[T]he board believed that [Officer] Pedro was not completely truthful in describing his platonic relationship with the minor, who apparently was 16 years old at the time of the incident, or in stating that he did not know either the nature of her visit to the clinic or that abortions were performed there. [read post]
4 Nov 2004, 3:22 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 1:34 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:10 am
Pedro Malavet (University of Florida - Fredric G. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 21, 1923. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am
The judgment in Case C172/18 AMS Neve Ltd, Barnett Waddingham Trustees, Mark Crabtree v Heritage Audio SL, Pedro Rodríguez Arribas addresses questions concerning jurisdiction, in... [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V A. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
V.[9] Protocol, art. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 4:15 am
The judgment in Case C172/18 AMS Neve Ltd, Barnett Waddingham Trustees, Mark Crabtree v Heritage Audio SL, Pedro Rodríguez Arribas addresses questions concerning jurisdiction, in particular in cases involving Internet sales. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 1:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2004, 6:01 am
As noted by Professor Douglas Berman at Sentencing Law & Policy here, with the opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 12:48 am
Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States of America [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:40 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 11:21 am
Applying plain error review, the Court of Appeals concluded that the district court effectively conveyed to the defendant that 10 years “was the actual and inevitable sentence,” citing United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
United States, by Judith V. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:37 am
But just days after the California Supreme Court Upholds In-State Tuition For Illegal Immigrants, in Robert Martinez et al., v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:24 am
Descarga el documento: United States v. [read post]
