Search for: "United States v. Phan"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2009, 8:23 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:48 pm
"_______________________________PRESS RELEASEICO UNITED STATES V. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 6:49 am
” “Judge Conrad said one manager’s approval without the other is insufficient given that both Bui and Phan have equal voting rights when it comes to Golden Rooster — even if Bui and Phan are opposing parties in the suit. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 5:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 12:56 pm
In Phan v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 6:06 am
Kaplan (University of Chicago), on Monday, November 26, 2018 Tags: Conflicts of interest, Fund managers, Fund performance, Incentives, Misreporting, Mutual funds, Peer groups, Private equity, Reporting regulation, Reputation, Signaling, Venture capital firms Shareholder Voting in the United States: Trends and Statistics on the 2015-2018 Proxy Season Posted by Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board, Inc.,… [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:50 pm
” Phan, 137 S.W.3d at 767 (citing Cooper v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:20 am
Preska, Chief United States District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, rule [read post]
