Search for: "United States v. Polite"
Results 161 - 180
of 13,444
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2010, 4:05 pm
In his dissent in the Citizen United v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
First, there is an interesting discussion of the history of the corporate form in the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 9:37 am
United States, which is being argued on Jan. 17. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on June 8, 1911. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:43 am
Well, if there is one thing we can say about us “younger” states out in the Western United States, it’s this: We can have a delegate attend a political convention who is older than the state itself. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
The Montana Supreme court pushed back against unlimited campaign spending by upholding the state Corrupt Practices Act, saying that Montana has a unique history of political corruption from the days of the copper kings. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 1:57 am
The United States and state constitutions give individuals a right to freedom of speech. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 9:07 am
A Federal Court has ruled aliens who are in the United States on temporary work visas may not make political contributions to federal candidates or political parties. [read post]
5 May 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 26, 1902. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Proclaimed by the President of the United States on July 26, 1911. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:33 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Adams v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
Plaintiffs claim that global warming, to which Defendants contribute as the "five largest emitters of carbon dioxide in the United States and . . . among the largest in the world," Connecticut v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:57 am
The US Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:08 pm
On Monday, CAAF released it’s fourth opinion of the term in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V (1) Extradition shall not be granted if: (a) the person sought would, if proceeded against in the territory of the requested Party for the offense for which his extradition is requested, be entitled to be discharged on the grounds of a previous acquittal or conviction in the territory of the requesting or requested Party or of a third State; or (b) the prosecution for the offense for which extradition is requested has become barred by lapse of time according to the law… [read post]
