Search for: "United States v. Pollack" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm by Sean Hanover
United States, 627 A.2d 968, 970 (D.C. 1993) (quoting United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 9:05 am by Amy Howe
”  Molly also rounded up early coverage and commentary on yesterday’s four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am by Patricia Salkin
The Complaint asserts six causes of action: (1) a violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution based on Defendants’ actions in denying Plaintiffs their rights to freely practice their religion; (2) a violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:55 am by Patricia Salkin
The Complaint asserts six causes of action: (1) a violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution based on Defendants’ actions in denying Plaintiffs their rights to freely practice their religion; (2) a violation of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:55 am by Tara Hofbauer
” On Tuesday, Wells highlighted opinions from the federal District of Oregon in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 10:35 am by Tara Hofbauer
The Supreme Court reached a decision today in Riley v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:32 pm by Tom Goldstein and Dan Stein
Roberts would also represent a number of states in the Microsoft antitrust case, United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm by Daniel Pollack
Researchers estimate that 40%-50% of all first marriages in the United States will end in divorce or permanent separation. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:53 pm by Daniel Pollack
Researchers estimate that 40%-50% of all first marriages in the United States will end in divorce or permanent separation. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:11 am by Marissa Miller
United States, in which the Justices will consider whether the Federal Tort Claims Act allows a prison inmate to sue the government for an alleged sexual assault committed by guards at a federal prison. [read post]