Search for: "United States v. Powers"
Results 121 - 140
of 20,364
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
Surveillance The trade body techUK has released a statement saying that the proposed changes to the Investigatory Powers Act would weaken safeguards relating to the bulk collection of datasets by intelligence services and expressly permit generalised mass surveillance. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Earlier this month, in Trump v. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 11:29 am
The Council of Europe will bear the travel and subsistence expenses of one representative from each member State (two in the case of the state whose representative has been elected Chair). [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 1:13 pm
The post Amicus Brief Explains in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:38 am
Moreover, it is not a monopolist in the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
Some scholars assume that the President holds an "Office under the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 8:38 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:18 am
(L to R) Mark Royero (2L); Adam Stolz (coach); Kaitlin Prece (2L); not pictured: Luis Reyes (coach) The Supreme Court of the United States can agree on something: In McElrath v. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 9:14 pm
United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 3:19 am
United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
As CISA Director Jen Easterly noted to the New York Times,[15] the most “critical infrastructure” of the United States is our cognitive infrastructure – the framework and tools by which citizens examine and analyze reality. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:44 pm
With Monday’s oral arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:56 pm
In Oneok, Inc. v. [read post]
[Josh Blackman] The Sequel to Doe v. Mills: Justice Barrett Tightens The Screws On The Shadow Docket
19 Mar 2024, 2:10 pm
Today, the Supreme Court issued an order on the emergency docket in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
Derived from the case United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 11:42 am
In National Small Business United, d/b/a the National Small Business Association, et al. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:24 am
" United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Second, the statute gives the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) the power not only to impose tariffs, but also to impose fees and other restrictions, as well as take all other appropriate and feasible action within the power of the President. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Second, the statute gives the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) the power not only to impose tariffs, but also to impose fees and other restrictions, as well as take all other appropriate and feasible action within the power of the President. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
