Search for: "United States v. Pretty Products, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2022, 1:44 pm by Natalie Kirby
Winchester (NY 1852): Establishing a General Duty for Manufacturers So, while there is no uniform product liability law in the United States, product liability laws across the USA are by and large similar, with experts largely agreeing that the foundational case for product liability law is Thomas v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 11:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rhino allegedly created the false impression that its products are made in the United States, even though import records show that the products are shipped from China. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 9:01 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc., (TAOS) v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:09 pm by Gene Quinn
On Tuesday, November 9, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in TiVo, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 7:40 pm by Larry
We have been following along with Gilda Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
In the interests of maintaining that success, we offfer here a state-by-state break down of the precedent refusing to adopt “fraud on the market” or similar presumed reliance theories to state-law (not federal - no RICO or antitrust cases here) causes of action – everything from product liability to consumer fraud to state securities and other statutes. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 12:36 pm by Gene Quinn
On Friday, August 27, 2010, Interval Research Corporation (a Paul Allen non-practicing entity) brought a patent infringement lawsuit against a who’s who of tech companies in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington at Seattle, specifically suing AOL, Inc., Apple, Inc., eBay, Inc., Facebook, Inc., Google Inc., Netflix, Inc., Office Depot, Inc., OfficeMax Inc., Staples,… [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 4:30 am by Gene Quinn
Last week, on November 18, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit granted a stay to HemCon, Inc., which will prevent implementation of the injunction issued against it and in favor of Marine Polymer Technologies, Inc. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 1:04 pm by Larry
However, the law is pretty clear that (with some exceptions) genuine products bearing an authorized trademark that are not materially different from the same product offered for sale in the United States are admissible gray market products. [read post]