Search for: "United States v. Reddy"
Results 1 - 20
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2019, 8:00 am
Reddy’s”) infringed its rights in United States Patent No. 7,772,209 (“the ‘209 Patent”). [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 7:51 pm
Indus. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Readers of this Blog are no doubt familiar with United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 7:23 pm
In an unpublished opinion by the 11th Circuit, the court in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 8:58 am
On September 26, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a panel decision in Sunovion Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 6:53 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 2:12 pm
Reddy’s Lab’ys S.A. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 2:11 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found in favor of Eisai in Aciphex patent infringement suit against Teva Pharmaceuticals and Dr. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 3:29 pm
AND NAGAKRISHNA REDDY, M.D. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 9:37 am
On June 22, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Maslenjak v.United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
It was Transmitted by the President of the United States of America to the Senate on August 2, 1979. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 10:03 am
by Dennis Crouch Nuvo Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 5:47 am
(“Sunovion”) appealsfrom the decision of the United States District Court forthe District of New Jersey granting summary judgmentthat Dr. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 9:03 pm
v. [read post]
30 Oct 2006, 5:58 am
For example, of the 57 largest selling drugs in the United States, more than 30 are scheduled to loose patent protection by 2008, representing total sales of more than $60 billion. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:01 pm
EISAI v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 3:56 am
Reddy’s and Teva, Civ. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 5:37 am
REDDY, a RSI information technology employee altered and falsified these access logs before they were produced to the United States. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am
However, opined the court, “an award will not be overturned unless the award violates a strong public policy, is totally irrational or exceeds a specifically enumerated limitation on the arbitrator's power” and that the grounds for vacating an arbitration award are narrowly construed.With respect to vacating an arbitration award on the grounds that it violates strong public policy, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Reddy v Schaffer, 123 AD3d 935, said that a… [read post]
