Search for: "United States v. Regan" Results 101 - 120 of 150
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
As it explained in United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 3:00 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States came as quite a surprise. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 11:24 am
White, quoted in "A Pronouncing Dictionary of the Supreme Court of the United States" (PDF). [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:53 am by Amy Howe
The Justices were also clearly bothered by the prospect that a ruling in Lozano’s favor might put the United States at odds with other signatories to the Convention; Justice Breyer, for example, told Regan that “every other country is against you. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 4:30 pm by Lauren Bateman
” These include the dismantling of terror cells in Portland, Oregon, and Lackawanna, New York, as well as the conviction of several Al Qaeda and Lashkar-e-Taiba affiliates operating in the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 10:26 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 702 F.2d 1005, 1013 (Fed. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:10 am by Jamison Koehler
United States: What happens if the evidence introduced by the government at the probation hearing is different than the evidence it presented at trial? [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm by Benjamin Wittes
 The Supreme Court has developed this concept further since Youngstown; the most frequently cited case is Dames & Moore v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 1:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
MORSON, Plaintiff, -against KREINDLER & KREINDLER, LLP, Defendant.09 CV 2994 (DRH)(ARL)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 2011 U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:46 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The government and the state disagreed explicitly on whether a prior Supeme Court ruling, in the 1984 case of South Carolina v. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:20 am
  The attorney was charged with obstruction and making false statements related to a Food and Drug Administration investigation into drug promotions (United States v. [read post]