Search for: "United States v. Reve"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2015, 8:49 am
” The Commissioner also contended that the proper test for determining whether the loan agreements constituted a security was the “family resemblance test” announced by the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:22 pm
Price, 361 U.S. 304, 31 3 (1960 ) United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:29 pm
However, the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 10:23 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 5:16 am
The Delaware court sets the standard of review using the the four-factor formula set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
Black should have looked at the formula used by the United States Supreme Court in Reves v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 10:28 am
Cir. 2011) (noting that to carry its burden under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, the pa- tentee must sufficiently “tie the expert testimony on damages to the facts of the case”).As to the injunction:Yet, the injunction states that SAP “shall not (a) charge to or accept payment of software maintenance from that customer with respect to any of the Infringing Products in the United States; or (b) license or sell any new ‘seats’ or otherwise charge… [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 8:32 pm
Amendments to title 18, United States Code, relating to sex offender registration.Sec. 142. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:00 am
The Notice has provoked some consternation in the secondary market for commercial bank loans because the Notice suggests that certain transactions characterized as “loans” in the municipal market may in fact qualify as securities under the Federal securities laws pursuant to the Supreme Court’s ruling in Reves v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 6:20 am
By Anne Sherry, J.D.In a forcefully stated keynote address to the SEC Regulation Outside the United States conference in London, Enforcement Director Gurbir Grewal insisted that the SEC does not “regulate by enforcement” when it applies longstanding regulations to new and emerging technologies and products. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:24 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 8:31 am
” In Reves v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:42 pm
They have chosen to be together and to make the United States their family’s home. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Indeed, as one federal court recently stated, “the ‘crypto’ nomenclature may be of recent vintage, but the challenged transactions fall comfortably within the framework that courts have used to identify securities for nearly eighty years. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 9:01 pm
”[3] He further stated, “Congress’ purpose in enacting the securities laws was to regulate investments, in whatever form they are made and by whatever name they are called. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
Good morning, Chairman McHenry, Ranking Member Waters, and members of the Committee. [read post]
